See it work
Drop a markup PDF here
Anything SparkFlow should know about this markup?
Kitchen receptacles only. Client wants LP-4 untouched elsewhere.
Start Skip
Kitchen receptacles only. Client wants LP-4 untouched elsewhere.
Reading the markup
- Reading page 1 of 1
- 3 notes found
- Matched to E-101 Rev 3
- Checking 12 validators
7 proposals from this markup
Bound to E-101 Rev 3
1 of 7 applied
6 applied, 1 taught
-
Replace the receptacle by the sink with a GFCI receptacle, LP-4-12
Replace the receptacle by the sink with a GFCI receptacle, LP-4-12
Standard S-E-09 · 12 validators passed
Reference shown: OESC Rule 26-700(11) (illustrative)
Accept Reject Teach
-
Add a receptacle for the dishwasher, LP-4-16
Add a receptacle for the dishwasher, LP-4-16
Standard S-E-09 · 12 validators passed
Accept Reject Teach
-
Upsize the feeder breaker for LP-4 from 100 A to 125 AUpsize the feeder breaker for LP-4 to 150 A
Upsize the feeder breaker for LP-4 from 100 A to 125 AUpsize the feeder breaker for LP-4 to 150 A
Accept Reject Teach
Our standard is a 150 A feeder here.
Send
-
Relabel the panel schedule after the change
-
Add an emergency light at the service door
-
Move the three-way switch out of the door swing
-
Revise the circuit tags on sheet E-101
Applied. Undo in one step.
Remembered for your firm.
The next similar markup is read your firm’s way.
7 proposals, 6 applied, 1 taught, every one recorded
The conductor size shown (3 AWG copper) is smaller than the breaker shown (100 A) allows; the readings differ.
- Schedule
- 100 A
- Feeder tag
- 3 AWG Cu
Reference shown: OESC Table 2 (illustrative)
Automated review of the cited items only. Not a code compliance determination. A licensed engineer reviews before reliance.
Does the receptacle within 1.5 m of this sink need GFCI protection?
Yes. A receptacle within 1.5 m of a sink requires Class A GFCI protection, with the usual exception for one behind a stationary appliance.
OESC Rule 26-700(11) · the edition your firm licensed
- Citation
- OESC Rule 26-700(11) (illustrative)
- Edition
- The edition your firm licensed
The rule text opens in your firm’s licensed code book; it is not reproduced here.
When the facts are not on the drawing, the answer says so: “Insufficient facts: the sink’s location is not on this sheet.”
-
1 of 12
Your drawing, as always.
AutoCAD, your sheet, your standards. SparkFlow waits in the dock until you need it.
-
2 of 12
A markup PDF arrives.
Your reviewer’s redlines, dropped on the palette.
-
3 of 12
Tell it what matters.
Before it reads a page, SparkFlow asks whether there is anything it should know. Here the engineer adds one line.
-
4 of 12
SparkFlow reads it.
Each note is read and matched to the sheet you have open, by number, title block, revision and geometry.
-
5 of 12
It proposes, and waits.
The markup becomes a list of proposals, each with its evidence: the sheet it is bound to, the validators’ result, the reference shown.
-
6 of 12
You decide.
Then it works, and nothing else can be accepted until it is done.
-
7 of 12
Drawn as one AutoCAD transaction.
1 of 7 applied. Undo in one step, and an audit entry records who approved what, and when.
-
8 of 12
The next one, ready.
The first is ticked off the list and the second waits, with its own Accept, Reject and Teach.
-
9 of 12
Teach it your firm’s way.
One correction, in plain words. The proposal is read again, and the next similar markup is read the same way.
-
10 of 12
Ask it to check a drawing.
A review reads the sheet against your standards and lists what it found, with the clause beside each finding.
-
11 of 12
Ask it a code question.
An answer with its reference, from the documents your firm licenses, processed in Canada.
-
12 of 12
Every change, approved by you.
The rest were decided the same way. Processed and stored in Canada. Never used to train shared models.
Request a demo